To: ztect who wrote (44124 ) 12/24/2000 9:00:18 PM From: ztect Respond to of 44908 RE: LT , response I received from PH. What follows is my email to Paul Henry below which is his response. I would have posted earlier, but while away I purposely didn't even check my email. > -----Original Message----- > From: ztect@hotmail.com > Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 8:28 PM > To: phenry@tsig.com > Subject: LT loan & Conversion Shares > > Dear Paul, > > The below posts address my concerns regarding the LT loan. > > I'm especially concerned about the unnecessary > dilution created by conversion at these or lower > prices created partly by overall market conditions. > > Does the combined entity of Affinity plus the rest of TIGI > have any revenue to at least pay back a portion of the LT loan > to minimize this potential dilution? > > Any announcement of at least a partial payment IMO > would be very beneficial especially in these market conditions. > > Sincerely, > > Xxxxxx X Xxxxx > xxx-xxx-0000 > 000-xxx-xxxx (cell) > > > > > ======================================= > To: V$gas.Com who wrote (43930) > From: Bald Eagle Wednesday, Dec 20, 2000 5:46 PM ET > Reply # of 43941 > > > With 2.65 million bucks in convertibles, at today's close > they would get close to 10,000,000 million shares. That > would be less than 10% of the shares that are outstanding > now. Of course, if it drops to ten cents, it could turn > into 30 million or more. > > That still wouldn't bring them close to the 300,000,000 > that they are allowed to issue, so they wouldn't need a > reverse split to issue more shares > > ==================================== > > To: Bald Eagle who wrote (43932) > From: ztect Wednesday, Dec 20, 2000 6:08 PM ET > Reply #43941 of 43941 > Yep, that's the problem in addition to the > general overall condition of the markets. > Convert holders short using the bonds as collateral > to cover thus hedging against their own investment, > and in a down market > with the added burden of margin calls and tax selling > putting downward pressure on volume while increasing sells, > dilution gets worse with every decrease in price. > > When I read and understood the terms of the loan, > I said to myself okay that won't be too bad since the > price was then over $1.5 resulting in less than > 2 million conversion shares. However, as you've noted > with the decrease in share price the conversion shares > create substantially making dilution much more worrisome > and I, like you, have been recalculating the conversion > share number at these prices. > That's why I've noted on a couple prior occasions that > if Affinity has revenues as "news released" or GS has > any remaining cash it hasn't burned through, that any cash > or revenues be used to pay down, at least, a > portion of the LT debt. If even half of the debt were paid > off then that would be a creation at these levels of 5 > as oppose to 10 mil shares. > > Morover if such > payment were made, especially in conjunction > with a stabilization or bounce in the overall markets > with maybe another Coca Cola or other > corporate announcement, then > a change in the stocks price trend possibly could > occur with pressure being put on any short positions > further mitigating the dilutive impact caused by the > remaining balance of the LT note becoming > conversion shares. > > z =========================================== ======================================== From: Paul Henry To: ztect@hotmail.com Subject: RE: LT loan & Conversion Shares Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 09:29:51 -0500 Z, This is being worked on, but I am not at liberty to disclose. If we accomplish what we have been discussing with LT, I believe you and all shareholder will be very pleased with the result. Worst case, I believe we can get a substantial extension. Stay tuned. Paul Henry