Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (130103)	12/26/2000 10:45:17 PM
From: Dan3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1571734

Re: send in a whole lot of decoys If there were a credible defense, one missile would be sent 5 minutes ahead of the rest, detonated in the stratosphere, and the resulting EMP (electromagnetic pulse) would take out the sensing equipment needed to guide the interceptors or plasma beams, or whatever, to their targets. Inertial guidance is good enough for an ICBM, but the interceptors must be perfectly on target, and need sensitive detectors to track their targets - and those detectors are far too vulnerable to a device being detonated in the stratosphere to be of any practical use. Besides, the whole thing's irrelevant since far and away the most credible threat is delivery via suitcase, not ICBM. Dan