Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : PROPAGANDA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Clarke who wrote (218)	12/28/2000 4:27:35 PM
From: KLP	Respond to of 318

US State Department declares war on The Washington Post Yahoo! Asia - News World Friday, December 29 4:32 AM SGT US State Department declares war on The Washington Post WASHINGTON, Dec 28 (AFP) - The State Department declared war on one of the United States' most respected newspapers on Thursday, blasting The Washington Post for critical reports it described as "inaccurate," "ludicrous" and "self-serving." The unusual attack, delivered by spokesman Philip Reeker at his daily news briefing, followed the publication of the editorial on Thursday alleging the department was indifferent to the plight of American parents whose children have been abducted and brought to foreign countries. "The accusations made in the editorial today, most especially that we somehow treat these cases with indifference or worse, are completely groundless," Reeker told reporters. "We were extremely disappointed by both the article and the editorial, neither of which accurately depicts the depth and seriousness of our efforts in these cases," he said. He made little attempt to disguise his contempt for the Post and maintained not only that the story and editorial were incorrect, but that the newspaper had intentionally ignored information provided by the State Department to reporters covering the child abduction issue. "We regret that the Post has consistently been unable or unwilling to take a fair and more honest approach to this very serious topic," Reeker said, taking aim at the paper's suggestion that only its own reporting had caused the issue to be dealt with more seriously. "The implication in the article that somehow Washington Post stories that date back many months on this subject ... pushed us to take a more proactive approach on this are ludicrous and ultimately self-serving," he said. Allowing that child abduction had at one time not received the attention it should have, Reeker pointed out the department itself had corrected the deficiencies well before the Post began its reports. "The Office of Children's Issues has nearly tripled in the last three years, an effort that began well-before The Washington Post even discovered that international child abduction existed," he said sarcastically. Reeker stopped short of demanding a retraction or apology from the paper, saying any move to revise the reports or the editorial would have to come from the Post itself. Washington Post ombudsman Michael Getler was not immediately available to comment on Reeker's remarks. The Post editorial, took note of complaints reported in the earlier stories lodged by parents who said they had been badly treated by officials at the State Department and the Department of Justice when they looked for help in having their abducted children returned. "It's hard to see why the US government would treat with indifference -- sometimes even contempt -- the efforts of parents seeking the return of children who have been illegally abducted and spirited overseas during custody disputes," the Post wrote. "Neither the FBI nor the State Department has been functioning well in this capacity -- at least not consistently," the editorial said, citing as evidence the complaints of parents quoted in its earlier reports, the most recent of which appeared at the weekend asia.dailynews.yahoo.com