Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Shread who wrote (39399)	12/27/2000 3:28:12 PM
From: JRI	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42787

Any bets for the close...Naz pretty resilent until now...and a burst thru +40 (or so), previous intraday low...would be a positive, no? Naz sure seems like it wants to break the +40...and the Dow looks unwilling to give up gains... I would think we have a bit more upside (2590-2600) before Friday....before retrace... Interesting stat on CNBC....in 5 of 6 down Naz years, Naz was up for the final trading week...also, the top UP week was '73!

To: Paul Shread who wrote (39399)	12/27/2000 5:28:49 PM
From: Terry Whitman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42787

Interesting scan. How do you compare historical trading range? I'm not touching softie till we see what the new admin. has up it's sleeve. Even if they do nothing- 13 states have suits against them, and probably a few foreign countries. What do the charts on SPLS and NWL look like? Buffett is buying here- public.wsj.com I lost my arse on USG about 6 or 8 yrs. ago- Suckers got into big debt problems and I rode it from 2+ all the way down to 1/4, doubling down at 1. My first real lesson in when not to double down. It reverse split, and I bailed. That was the bottom, but I don't think they've ever made it back to my initial buy price. I bet Buffett never gets burned like that... <g>