SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (51652)12/27/2000 3:51:08 PM
From: yard_man  Respond to of 436258
 
that explains a lot, CB.

Don't get me wrong, I think the guy was a bozo overcome by evil

he lashed out at those closest to the situation -- some folks in payroll -- it is very sad

obviously he had been having some indigestion about the situation for quite some time ...



To: Ilaine who wrote (51652)12/27/2000 3:51:39 PM
From: flatsville  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
CB--

There is a due process provision prior to levy by the IRS - if the IRS sends you a notice of deficiency you have 90 days to challenge it in the Tax Court. There are a few exceptions - if the amount due is shown on the return the taxpayer filed, if the amount due is the result of a mathmatical error by the taxpayer, or if the IRS determines that there is a risk that delay would prejudice collection. In all other cases, the IRS can't proceed to collection until the 90 days have passed. Even then, the tax payer has the right to pay the tax and pursue administrative procedures for a refund.

You know this and I know this. The problem is that the above doesn't jive with the popular notion of "due process" for reasons I certainly can't explain. Everyone seems to think if they got to go to "court," whatever the hell that means, that somehow the taxman would be hamstrung in his evil efforts to collect or that some curious notion of "due process" would be satisfied. Go figure...