Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (51665)	12/27/2000 4:07:26 PM
From: LLCF	Respond to of 436258

<I wouldn't call IRS agents touchy-feely but they are a lot less scary than they used to be.> Yes, and everyone seems to agree that this is a good thing... even if the same amount of tax dollars are collected, imagine that... dAK

To: Ilaine who wrote (51665)	12/27/2000 4:08:52 PM
From: flatsville	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

CB- I'm fairly familiar with that publication and the collection process. That's how I knew that sick f*ck who blew those people away had most likely defaulted on a payment agreement to advance to the levy process. Many on the thread seemed to believe that some "court" requirement should have been met to legitimize the levy...that the collection process is somehow extra-legal...that going to "court" will somehow resolve collection issues in the TP interest. Ho, ho, ho. They need to do some reading.