To: SecularBull who wrote (119742 ) 12/27/2000 5:25:49 PM From: Johannes Pilch Respond to of 769670 Well the facts are all before you. You may claim it was all about economic and political power, and that it had little to do with the morality of slavery, but the facts do not support this view. The facts support the view that it was about economy, society and morality. Economic From: Sterling Cockrill, planter from Courtland, AL, 18 Sept. 1865 We have much to say in vindication of our conduct, but this we must leave to history. The bloody conflict between brothers, is closed, and we 'come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.' The South had $2,000,000,000 invested in Slaves. It was very natural, that they should desire to protect, and not lose this amount of [slave] property. Their action in this effort, resulted in War. There was no desire to dissolve the Union, but to protect this [slave] property. The issue was made and it is decided. SocialThe condition of slavery with us is, in a word, Mr. President, nothing but the form of civil government instituted for a class of people not fit to govern themselves. It is exactly what in every State exists in some form or other. It is just that kind of control which is extended in every northern State over its convicts, its lunatics, its minors, its apprentices. It is but a form of civil government for those who by their nature are not fit to govern themselves. (Jeff Davis, Confederate President) Moral[The Confederacy's] foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery . . . is his natural and normal condition. [Alexander Stephens, Vice-President of the Confederacy: Augusta, Georgia, Daily Constitutionalist, March 30, 1861.] These issues are all linked to one thing - SLAVERY.