Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StockDung who wrote (65153)	12/27/2000 8:44:31 PM
From: Dave Kiernan	Respond to of 122087

The game of professional investment is intolerably boring and overexacting to anyone who is entirely exempt from the gambling instinct. Whilst he who has it, must pay to this propensity the appropriate toll....Keynes.

To: StockDung who wrote (65153)	12/27/2000 9:44:53 PM
From: Cheeky Kid	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

I agree, it's like a casino. People want the edge, they want to beat the odds, that's what the market is nowadays. And in my opinion, TA is just another money making scheme. People bring lucky items to the casino to improve odds, just like the market. Superstition plays a large role in the market as does it in casinos. Even the stars and planets have a role in the market. People even pay people who combine TA and astrology. That's the biggest hoot of all = paying someone who has a system or technique to improve odds at the casino. And before any people flame me because your pay site, news letter subscription, etc, etc, etc, WORKS.......so does the morning horoscope or the 1-800-FORTUNETELLER work for millions world wide as well. In my opinion, of course.

To: StockDung who wrote (65153)	12/29/2000 1:11:04 AM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Hmm, wonder who is next?: "SEC Sues Analyst John Westergaard, Two Related Firms for Stock-Touting By JOHN CONNOR Dow Jones Newswires WASHINGTON -- The Securities and Exchange Commission sued analyst John Westergaard and two companies he controls, alleging that they touted stocks on the Internet and through news releases without revealing they had been paid to publish that analysis. The two corporate entities -- Westergaard.com Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Westergaard Broadcasting Network.com Inc. -- settled the SEC's charges without admitting or denying wrongdoing, consenting to an order that permanently enjoins them from violating federal securities laws. Lawrence Ginsburg, the attorney representing WCI and WBN, said the consent agreement speaks for itself. He declined to comment further. Mr. Westergaard is fighting the charges, which include an allegation that he violated antifraud provisions of federal securities laws. During the period covered by the SEC's complaint, Mr. Westergaard was chairman, publisher and editorial director of WCI, and chairman of WBN. He also was WCI's majority stockholder. Mr. Westergaard, who resides in New York City, called the SEC's case against him "bizarre" and accused the agency of conducting a "three-year vendetta" against him. "This is a stock-touting case," said the SEC in its complaint, filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District, in Manhattan. The agency is seeking a permanent injunction against Mr. Westergaard to bar him from further violations of federal securities laws, as well as unspecified civil penalties. The SEC's complaint alleged that the defendants charged small-cap publicly traded companies as much as $48,000 to publish positive reports about them that were disseminated through press releases, an Internet radio show and an Internet Web site. The complaint alleges that Mr. Westergaard misled prospective investors by falsely claiming his analysis was "independent." The SEC staff previously concluded an earlier investigation into the sufficiency of Mr. Westergaard's disclosures of compensation received in connection with stock recommendations without recommending an enforcement action against him.