Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Noneyet who wrote (34421)	12/27/2000 5:45:55 PM
From: bonnuss_in_austin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35685

Indeed, Thomas ... it doesn't matter, ... because in any case, the trades were fictitious. Had to be, by the proof of the tape. <g> Which makes me wonder about how these people are really 'using' the SI boards and the people on them. You know, something to this effect: "Let's reco and then short." I would imagine that it's been done before. Not quite 'spamming,' but closer to fraud, as I think someone mentioned earlier today. Best thing about SI is that there are so many people who are very sophisticated investors who keep good track of every tick and bit of news. Particulary those with Naz Level II who are able to see every single trade that crosses -- and actually executes. Such as the poster, 'ibg.' Always, always, goes to credibility, IMO. Nice job, 'ibg.' Thank you for the information. 'b-i-a' ###