Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tangoexotica who wrote (65205)	12/28/2000 1:28:56 PM
From: Anthony@Pacific	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 122087

The damage has been unmeasurable and It is my intention at exacting justice in every possible way legally.

To: tangoexotica who wrote (65205)	12/28/2000 11:56:43 PM
From: bandita	Respond to of 122087

An interesting conundrum. If one makes allegations concerning an attorney then that attorney should have the right to defend him/herself. However, the question becomes how much latitude will be given in that defense. Things might be disclosed that would have never come out otherwise... thereby squelching the desire to sue an attorney when you feel you have been wronged. Of course, the malpractice insurance company would figure into the equation if someone has malpractice insurance. Your personal information becomes fodder for a slew of people thus undermining the whole confidential nature of the original information by virtue of filing a lawsuit. Lawsuits are a nasty business all the way around. There is a toll extracted even for the "winner"...but sometimes "principles" are the governing factor