Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike M2 who wrote (51957)	12/28/2000 1:41:38 PM
From: marginmike	Respond to of 436258

Didnt have to buy it in 93-94 cause the price was the same 3 years later thanks to Press and FUD. Even today, even though I do not own the stock(my familly still does) I catch the press falsly reporting info. There are 2 analysts that are always negative on Qcom, nomatter what. They are always the ones quoted, why? Because they provide the juicy scoop that they will get anhilated in the market. The one thing about QCOM MGMT is they are baisicly an Honest bunch, that believe in deadlines, and proper disclosures. Thus when some numbskull analyst or journalist claims they are lying its comical. If you listened to Qcom MGMT in JAN you would have missed gettin anhilated in may. They were one of the first Tech's to fess up in 1Q.