Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (90893)	12/29/2000 10:19:02 AM
From: Rajala	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

>But don't ask for my help as I don't do homework >for dummies. Tsk, tsk, carranza4. So you said such admission on N´s web site and, hey, looks like its not. I´m amazed. Amidst all these China deal promoters I always thought "well, at least this carranza5 guy is honest". Come clean on this one, my friend, otherwise you look like... er.. slightly... er... - rajala

To: carranza2 who wrote (90893)	12/29/2000 8:51:52 PM
From: Ingenious	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

carranza2: fyi. no one publicly admits they need a license or infringe a product. that would be an admission and companies don't do that (unless they are terminally stupid). nok will maintain they don't need a license until they are forced (read sued). for example, ericsson maintained non-infringement and further claimed they owned soft handoff technology. low and behold, they paid q $250M and purchased the infra-structure. the stock rocketed. my condolences if you base your investment outlook in Q on NOK's comments.