To: CIMA who wrote (27 ) 1/1/2001 9:40:48 PM From: john Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 71 From the 10SB, note some of the alliances SBTI's competition has,,,,,,,,,,, looks to me like SBTI is attempting to align themselves with commercial banks. Competition In order to achieve commercial sales of our biometric products, we must compete with many well-established United States and foreign manufacturers in the biometrics market. Key manufacturers competing in the dynamic signature verification market include Checkmate Electronics Inc., PenOP Inc., SOFTPRO, Xenetek, and Ink Tools. These manufacturers exemplify the fact that the development of strong alliance partners is a key success factor in this field. Checkmate has a strategic marketing agreement with IBM. PenOP has a series of agreements with Microsoft, Netscape, Adobe and Eastman Systems. SOFTPRO has multiple international distribution agreements with UNISYS. Ink Tools has a strategic alliance with Palm Corporation. In any new technology (especially where consistent industry profitability is several years away), the ability to make agreements with tenured high tech companies is a key concern. The ability to partner is further leveraged when successful pilot programs are promoted effectively. Leading manufacturers of voice recognition systems include InterVoice-Brite, Inc., Orga, Veritel, VeriVoice, and ITT Industries. Increasingly, companies in this field are becoming adept at several input technologies. As the prices of input devices fall, the value proposition shifts to software attributes like the logic of comparing input data to the digital template, file storage, and verification times. For retail banking transactions, authentication time against a large data base is a critical consideration. Several of the technology segments surveyed now offer acceptably low input device prices and sufficiently fast authentication times. All of these companies have developed products and are authorized to sell products. All of our principal competitors are significantly larger, well established and are better capitalized than us, all of which could adversely affect our ability to compete.