Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 16yearcycle who wrote (113565)	12/28/2000 8:17:08 PM
From: GST	Respond to of 164684

Thank you Gene for clearing this up.

To: 16yearcycle who wrote (113565)	12/28/2000 8:17:52 PM
From: Sarmad Y. Hermiz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

>> There are three moderators and I know who they are. You brought it down to this level, so I felt I should respond. Eugene, I owe you. I've been reading your posts on the AMAT thread. And specifically your posts on Novellus. I bought at 30 and sold at 36. I know your intention was to short at 30 (a few days ago. Expecting it to break to 25), so I did the opposite. Since as you said, nvls behaved better, with more relative strength. Anyway, excuse the digression. You said there are 3 moderators. GST's point was to question the impression that the three actually discussed the issue, read the posts and made a positive decision for expulsion. I cannot believe that three intelligent people can decide that any statement about whether Yahoo's earnings justify its price (pro or con) is grounds for expelling a poster from a thread. (EDIT>>> but I also didn't believe Yahoo would go to 500, either. I guess there are a lot of bulls to go along with all the bulls__t)) I also am amazed that Mark Fowler has not been expelled after posting all his shorting taunts. I bet he came close, though. Cheers. Happy new year. The new fools thread is not worthy of you. And I value your posts on AMAT.