Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Big Dog who wrote (83096)	12/30/2000 12:25:11 PM
From: Razorbak	Respond to of 95453

Energy Policy Big: I think there is not a DEFINED energy policy. The actions taken toward energy are mostly ad hoc and meant to pacify the moment. So, what, you have to see it in a party's platform before it's considered "real"??? Several of Clinton's policies have been "mostly ad hoc and meant to pacify the moment." The same can be said for the policies of many Republican presidents, for that matter. How is this one any different? There does not exist a defined policy for the country to work toward energy security, which to me is what an energy policy should be about. Now on that part we can agree, but the distinction that you have drawn there is about the objective of the policy, not the existence of the policy itself. It's a great distinction, though. Thanks for the response. Razor