Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bambs who wrote (45580)	12/30/2000 11:46:56 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77400

csco will likely have revenue under 100 billion in 2010, likely have a p/e around 15. likely have over 10 billion shares, likely have 10% profit margins, and finally likely trade with a share price of $15 or less. What do you base these "likely" numbers on? Or are they just numbers you pulled out of the air?

To: bambs who wrote (45580)	12/31/2000 1:34:21 PM
From: The Phoenix	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 77400

I think your numbers a weak and meaningless. And you wonder why you get attacked. You see bambs - you bring it on yourself. While I allow you to post your thoughts and in turn present an opposing view in a non-attacking way, you instead respond with comments like the above when someone poses an opinion that differs from yours. You bring it on yourself. Perhaps if you viewed the thread and SI as a forum to share ideas you would gain more respect. Instead you push those with differing views away from you.... yet at the same time you suggest you're attempting to embrace the misled. You have a strange way of showing it. If my numbers are "weak and meaningless" perhaps you can share why? If rather than investing in start-ups with promising technology Cisco pushed those earnings to the bottom line what would the growth be? Why is looking at Cisco's earnings weak and meaningless when doing it this way? Why is it OK to ignore income (by way of using "actual earnings") that is reinvested into minority investments and acquisitions? It would seem to mean that ignoring this income ingores..... well......... income.... OG