Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : CIO COMPUTERIZED THERMAL IMAGING (formerly COII) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: chirodoc who wrote (18)	1/1/2001 11:44:36 AM
From: chirodoc	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 23

can biopsy increase cancer risk? CONCLUSION: Seeding or implantation was suspected as the cause of local recurrence in 7% (3/44) of the invasive cancers which did not receive radiotherapy. Acta Radiol 2000 Sep;41(5):435-40 Related Articles, Books, LinkOut Local breast cancer recurrence caused by mammographically guided punctures. Thurfjell MG, Jansson T, Nordgren H, Bergh J, Lindgren A, Thurfjell E Department of Oncology, Radiology and Clinical Immunology, Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden. PURPOSE: To evaluate the risk of needle track seeding or tumor cell implantation as the cause of locally recurrent breast cancer after breast conserving surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed recurrences from a consecutive series of 303 clinically nonpalpable breast cancers treated with breast conserving surgery after pre-operative localization. The median mammographic follow-up was 5.4 years. The suspicion of seeding or implantation was based on the location of the recurrent lesion in comparison with the needle path in two orthogonal mammographic projections. Pre-operative percutaneous biopsies had been done in 71% (214/303) of the cases. Postoperative radiotherapy was administered to 82% (194/238) of the invasive cancers and to 28% (18/65) of the ductal cancers in situ (DCIS). RESULTS: Locally recurrent cancer occurred in 11% (33/303) of the cases. Radiotherapy demonstrated a protective effect from relapse among invasive cancers but not for DCIS. Seeding or implantation was suspected in 3 recurrent invasive cancers which had not been subject to radiotherapy. The histopathological diagnosis of the primary cancer and the recurrent cancer were the same in these cases: adenoid cystic, mucinous and tubuloductal cancer. CONCLUSION: Seeding or implantation was suspected as the cause of local recurrence in 7% (3/44) of the invasive cancers which did not receive radiotherapy