Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nathan who wrote (52804)	1/2/2001 12:37:27 PM
From: Les H	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

You might go to astroecon.com and read his weekend comments. He has comments about bradley points to use as turns, not absolute highs or lows. Cycle points aren't much use unless they're confirmed by market oscillator or momentum indicators. Last Thursday was a short-term peak. Next potential low is this coming Friday using the 10-week cycle broken up into shorter subcycles.

To: Nathan who wrote (52804)	1/2/2001 12:51:47 PM
From: pater tenebrarum	Respond to of 436258

it's still possible of course...i think it may be inverted for several reasons: a) the put buying isn't indicative of a low; b)it tends to invert in down trends. often a succession that looks like high-low-high on the Bradley will turn into high-low-low in a down trend, with the interim high made somewhere in between. the major turn is at the end of Jan., and i still believe probabilities favor this to be a low. if it is a retest of a prior low, we should get the initial low that is to be tested relatively early in January. the full moon on the 9th would be an ideal point for putting that initial low in.