SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Poet who wrote (52943)1/2/2001 4:37:34 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor  Respond to of 436258
 
<<No satisfaction here at seeing these folks get wiped out.>>

None here either. It's not like we didn't try hard to warn 'em, though....in any event, the sentiment it displays suggests that capitulation will be slow and gradual, and that we may not see the "recognition wave" that the Cheif is always talking about (or if we do it will be drawn out and not abrupt...sorry Luc).

P.S. Why are the "shorts" the bad guys? Certainly we were less damaging than the LEH analyst hyping VERT at 215, or Blow-Jett hyping the 'Scam at 115!!



To: Poet who wrote (52943)1/2/2001 4:44:38 PM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
Ditto.... although I must say... some of those folks including "V", "dealie", "Claptonsguitar", and others made it very tough to post anything negative over there.

DAK



To: Poet who wrote (52943)1/2/2001 8:05:06 PM
From: AllansAlias  Respond to of 436258
 
What I find sad Poet is the use of the metaphor. As if there are really good ol' longs and those bad shorts. What silliness. One does not want to take satisfaction, but one has to marvel at the childishness involved here.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News