SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: allen menglin chen who wrote (114095)1/3/2001 2:29:27 PM
From: H James Morris  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 164684
 
>1/2 rate cut, and NAZ
Allen, 50 basis points is better than 25.
I think there's some excellent trading opportunities here.
Even money is coming back into the teleco's.



To: allen menglin chen who wrote (114095)1/3/2001 2:30:17 PM
From: Rob S.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
The FED handed the market everything it needs to chase the bears up a tree and send the bulls into the streets.



To: allen menglin chen who wrote (114095)1/3/2001 2:34:26 PM
From: GST  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
That was a real surprise to me -- the Feds data must be pretty bad to force a move like this. I wonder what they see coming in the jobs data? Looks like a hard landing now for sure.



To: allen menglin chen who wrote (114095)1/3/2001 3:52:29 PM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik  Respond to of 164684
 
One thing you can take to the bank, an inter-meeting rate cut practically guarantees another cut at the next meeting. 50 points will beget 50 more before we even think about letting rates be.



To: allen menglin chen who wrote (114095)1/3/2001 9:27:54 PM
From: Victor Lazlo  Respond to of 164684
 
<<A bit too late. we need more rate cut, another 1/4 on Jan 31. FED is way behind the curve.>>

There is no way to know that yet. we will only know whether that is true in retrospect.

Everyone sems to think that AG's job is so easy, and that he is such an idiot. What if somebody walked up to you and said ... "investing is so easy, you should have been long from Nov 99 through feb 2000, then gone directly to a 100% short position. It was so obvious. What are you, some kind of moron?"

Would that seem to be a reasonable statement?