Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Currencies and the Global Capital Markets -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert Douglas who wrote (2837)	1/3/2001 8:58:47 PM
From: Robert Douglas	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 3536

Sounds like I'm the only one if favor of the Bush tax cut. I'm assuming it would be negotiated down to about $1 trillion and that's spread over 10 years. Hardly a big deal in an economy that's $10 trillion. Besides, federal tax receipts have passed 20% of GDP and are the highest in history. Now is a good time to bring that number down while the economy isn't superheated. Besides, do you really think that Uncle Sam can resist spending that or actually pay down debt? That's up there with, "I'll respect you in the morning," and "The check is in the mail."

To: Robert Douglas who wrote (2837)	1/3/2001 11:33:44 PM
From: Sam	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3536

Whoops, of course you're right, it was half a billion, $500 million or so that the BC team collected. The point remains though. A tax cut in a time of surplus would be fine.... (a) if we hadn't already spent the money in the past (the debt), and (b) if we hadn't already promised the money in the future (SS). And, of course, this great surplus is still a figment of imagination. All sorts of bad things can happen to make it disappear. Like recessions. Like flat or down stock markets. Remember those? It's far better to pay down the debt. I know you think it can't be done. Perhaps I should be buying bridges, but I actually think it can be done, especially when Congress is so balanced. I think Gore would have paid down more debt, if he had taken office. If Bush would recognize that he was elected not only without a majority of votes cast, but without even a plurality of votes, he might even be able to do it. But frankly, I don't think it's in his mentality to recognize this. It was in Clinton's power to recognize that he only had a plurality (it was, to be sure, much easier for him since he had to deal with Republican Congressional majorities most of the time), and he made important changes his agenda. But the Republicans aren't going to let this opportunity pass, they believe that they are now in the driver's seat. I think that they may be very surprised in '02. Anyway, of course you're right, it was $500 million. s.