SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (37519)1/4/2001 2:01:38 AM
From: Mike Buckley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
Lindy,

That is why I said "prepare", Mike. When we were at the San Diego meeting, it should have been obvious that we should have got out.

First and foremost, when I offered at Q's annual meeting the idea that most all stocks including our gorillas were overvalued, that comment had nothing to do with the interest rate environment. It had only to do with valuation using virtually every metric I knew how to use, traditional and otherwise. Moreover, when I made the comment, it wasn't with the notion that we should sell our stocks. I'd make the exact same presentation today that I made then giving the same set of circumstances.

Now, back to changing interest rates.

Everything we discuss about the futility of timing is that obviousness is always easy to see when using hindsight. When would you have "prepared" to get out? July? September? December? Look at the interest rate charts and the chart of the Naz before you answer that one. :)

There are lots of ways to make money. My way and the Gorilla Gaming way isn't the only way. But by ignoring interest rate fluctuations and using Gorilla Gaming strategies, my portfolio increased at an average annual rate of more than 80% during the last two years. I'm aware of people who have done far better than I. None of 'em did it by trying to play the interest rate game. Getting out is certainly one way to try making money, but to say that we should have got out doesn't stand up to scrutiny in my opinion. If it was a mistake to remain fully invested during the last two years, I sure as heck hope I make that bad a mistake a lot more often.

--Mike Buckley



To: LindyBill who wrote (37519)1/4/2001 10:03:21 AM
From: straight life  Respond to of 54805
 
"That is why I said "prepare", Mike. When we were at the San Diego meeting, it should have been obvious that we should have got out."

For whatever it's worth, I hope I'm gonna take "three steps and a stumble" next time very seriously and lighten up somewhat; active portfolio management demands an active asset allocation model from me, that's one thing this bear's taught me (that's if I don't get consumed by greed, as usually happens).