SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (54046)1/4/2001 12:13:03 PM
From: yard_man  Respond to of 436258
 
I hope the "expert" was tongue in cheek -- I know a little bit about how they think, that's all. They are very political and want to please all parties as much as possible in any difficult situation

U know AG is a champion of 'free market' reforms (don't give me any cr*p -- I mean how he defines them, appearances, etc.). He would not support allowing them to go bankrupt if it meant giving up on dereg -- if, OTOH, they could go bankrupt and deregulation proceed ... but there'd be lots of whining and gnashing of teeth, not to mention much work for attorneys.

I don't think the operating losses -- while they may be huge in dollar terms -- are that big in the overall scheme of things (although they might cause indigestion to a lender or two).

my own POV is that bankruptcy would be a good option -- purely on economic basis -- but not sure if it would be "fair." The regulators out there created the out-of-whack situation which lead to this. I think what the CPUC tried to do was right -- pain needs to be shared by the investors and the consumers -- if it can work that way.

In a larger context, I think we are doomed to repeat Japan's failures -- the unwillingness to allow businesses to fail -- regulated or unregulated.

At one pt my father-in-law controlled a chunk of PCG. Thank goodness he has been out of it for a few years ...

I think there was something else behind the rate cut.