SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zoltan! who wrote (121032)1/4/2001 6:35:53 PM
From: peter a. pedroli  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
more legacy building by billy and his DOJ.

Sources: Possible Coverup at DOJ
Thursday, January 4, 2001
By David Shuster

WASHINGTON — Senior staff working for Attorney General Janet Reno
have threatened to fire an independent counsel investigating a possible
coverup at the Justice Department, Fox News has learned.

Independent Counsel Dave Barrett
led the investigation of former
Clinton housing secretary Henry
Cisneros, who admitted lying to
the FBI. According to sources, for
the last 10 months Barrett has
been presenting his grand jury
with new evidence alleging that
officials at the Justice Department
improperly tried to influence
actions by the Internal Revenue
Service.

Barrett was warned by senior
Justice Department officials to halt
his investigation. Barret's original
focus was on Cisneros, who
pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor
for lying during an FBI background check.

During his investigation, Barrett uncovered evidence of possible tax fraud
by Cisneros. But Justice Department officials, along with the IRS, said that
aspect of the Cisneros record was beyond the independent counsel's
jurisdiction. After looking at the evidence themselves, the Justice
Department and IRS both refused to pursue the matter.

According to well-placed sources, last year a top lawyer within the IRS
alleged that senior Justice Department officials were attempting to protect
Cisneros. The IRS employee, who is now a whistleblower for the
independent counsel, has reportedly testified that justice officials
pressured the IRS in other cases as well.

Allegations have been made before that the IRS backed off of President
Clinton's friends and stepped up cases against his opponents.

But the investigation at the Washington courthouse marks the first time
that any of these allegations have been reviewed by a federal grand jury.
Lawyers say dozens of IRS employees have testified in recent months.
And Fox News has learned that dozens inspectors general at the IRS and
Treasury Departments are helping with the case.

So far the investigation has not yielded evidence strong enough to warrant
any charges. But sources indicate the probe of the Justice Department
still has a long way to go.



To: Zoltan! who wrote (121032)1/4/2001 9:10:26 PM
From: Patricia Trinchero  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Greenspan has been clear that he does not support Bush's tax cut plan........he favors using the money to pay down the national debt. Greenspan's relationship with Bush Sr. was very cool and it appears that his son will not show any increased respect for the Fed Chairman.

Bush said last night that his tax cut will still be necessary and that the reduced interest rates will help the economy in tandem with those cuts!!!! The market dropped even after such a great rate reduction!!!!!!!!!! Look out folks.......we're in for a rough four years!!!!! Greenspan clearly lowered rates to ward off the need for an inflationary tax cut.

I think that the reduced national spending we are seeing in retail sales is indicative of the nations trust in Bush's ability to lead.......not!!!!!! Afterall.......most Americans didn't vote for the clown bush.



To: Zoltan! who wrote (121032)1/4/2001 9:54:14 PM
From: WTSherman  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769667
 
<Now that the adults will be in charge, Greenspan's pivotal role is largely over. If he stays true to his philosophical roots, he should welcome the Bush tax rate reductions.<

That's so ludicrous its actually funny!! If your definition of "adults" is people that the accidental president uses as substitute father figures, they you're right. If your definition of "adults" is people hauled out of retirement villages and nursing homes, you're right.

However, if your definition of "adults" is the very same people who built up $3.2 TRILLION in new government debt(in just 12 years), they you really ought to use some modifier in front of the word...you know, like "alledged adults" or "irresponsible adults" or "moronic adults"...