Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Network Appliance -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pirate_200 who wrote (5725)	1/4/2001 6:38:55 PM
From: quidditch	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10934

My expectation, if you see any negativity, it'll be in forward projections for Q4/next year rather than any change in Q3 results. That would have been my guess, too, DS and pirate. However, the notion does raise a question in the context of IT Dep't planning and spending. Let me start with an analogy: (i)in the recent destruction of the telco and F/O pic and shovel companies, we've seen companies warn that equipment orders either "fell off a cliff" or "were cancelled," leading to warnings and trashing of the stocks. (ii) Presumably, some of this savaging of orders that had either been recognized as revenue or was included in backlog was due to the difficulties the telcos (second tier and lower) have had in securing financing. My question in the IT area is how relevant are these factors in the IT context? Obviously, re. (i) above, orders can be cancelled or a prospective book can dry up, but are there limits to how much an IT Dep't and corporate planning can hamstring the need for more storage without sabotaging the system? Re.(ii) above, this factor would not seem to apply in NTAP's case. We have seen the analysts talk about reduced IT budgets, talk which picked up momentum this week and last. DS has made the point that NTAP may be able to buffer some of the downturn because of its unique filer system that avoids the need for new servers, and it's product offering has traditionally been priced below EMC's for supposedly equivalent benchmarks. The question, then, is NTAP's product mix sufficiently flexible to weather the storm that we've been told has brewed for 2001, which would encompass Q-4 and Q-1/2002?