Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marginmike who wrote (54458)	1/5/2001 9:54:35 AM
From: KeepItSimple	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Ho Ho ho, my SUNW poots just made enough for a lifetime of beer money..

To: marginmike who wrote (54458)	1/5/2001 10:09:20 AM
From: flatsville	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

mm- A bunch of us came up with that possibility as we cast about for a reason. I said I wasn't buying that crap that the FED was reacting to NAPM...a big player had to be in trouble, but who? My biggest problem with the CA ute part of the theory was that I could not see how a rate cut would solve the real problem. Yesterday I begged for someone to post whatever bit of convoluted logic might explain the reasoning. None came. It even makes less sense in light of this: nctimes.com If the above is true, no wonder certain consumer groups want those CA utilities destroyed. Rate cut won't help that situation.