Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: long-gone who wrote (62518)	1/6/2001 11:17:42 AM
From: Stephen O	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116759

Why bother to remove carbon monoxide from gas streams when a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell can convert carbon monoxide to Carbon dioxide and generate electricity in the process to boot.

To: long-gone who wrote (62518)	1/6/2001 11:53:59 AM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116759

long, you point out some potential for increased gold usage, good. Other than some enhancement to chemical process, what do you think are the chances for environmental utilization in a Bush administration? IMO application of significance has gold in every auto, home, or toaster.

To: long-gone who wrote (62518)	1/6/2001 4:15:05 PM
From: Tom M	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116759

Richard, I've noticed 2 signals of big moves - either a dead quiet thread, or one like this has been the last week where all kinds of posters come out of the woodwork. I've been long gold because I figured eventually the world's financial situation would stabilize and they could stop sitting on gold, or Clinton/Gore would be out, whichever came first. To me, gold's suppression is a sign of how bad things really are. They seem petrified to let up even the hedgers. I've frequently seen bashing in threads intensify when the shorts are trying to get out. Only 2 more weeks of the ESF in the Clinton team hands. I think many know they're screwed if the Bush team tells the truth and just exposes the whole thing to some badly needed sunlight & place the blame where it belongs, pronto. BTW I think Greenspan got suckered into creating the bubble as a diversion, but then there's somehow been a gun to Greenspan's head Clinton's whole second term to not let any air back out. BTW, aren't you the unofficial thread monitor since Abner got disinterested? regards, Tom