Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : HDTV: Television of the future here now -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LemonHead who wrote (8)	1/20/2001 3:34:23 PM
From: Ron	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152

Interesting that the feds are forcing broadcasters to transmit in HDTV but are not forcing cable companies to carry both HDTV and analog signals. Could be viewed as a slight setback to widespread adoption of HDTV by consumers, but as the article says...the marketplace is probably the best way. When people have a feasible choice between HDTV and analog, they will choose HDTV. Its like the difference between black and white and color, imho. nytimes.com W ASHINGTON, Jan. 19 — In a sharp setback for the nation's broadcasters, the Federal Communications Commission decided today to deny television stations the right to force cable companies to transmit both their digital and analog signals as they slowly convert to high-definition television, agency officials said. The decision was the parting shot at the broadcasters by William E. Kennard, who completed his last day as chairman of the commission after battling with the industry over a variety of issues for the better part of three years. The decision is all but certain to be upheld by regulators appointed by the next administration. Officials said the decision would be formally announced on Monday. They said Mr. Kennard, who has long said that the requirement imposed on the cable industry is probably unconstitutional, was joined in the decision by the agency's two Republican commissioners, Harold W. Furchtgott- Roth and Michael K. Powell, the leading candidate to be the next chairman. The order, which was being completed this evening, is part of a larger regulatory package, much of it issued today by the F.C.C., to address a number of complicated issues surrounding the delay in conversion to digital television. These included a proposed rule that would phase in requirements that television manufacturers produce sets capable of receiving both analog and digital signals. There was also a report affirming the agency's commitment to a particular technical standard for transmitting digital signals, one that has been widely favored by the industry and is different from the one used in Europe. But by far, the most closely watched issue concerned the application of the so- called must-carry rule to digital broadcasters. Under the 1992 Cable Act, cable operators are obliged to transmit the analog signals of broadcasters. Cable companies had challenged the constitutionality of the must-carry rules, saying that forcing them to transmit the programming of the networks violated their First Amendment rights. In 1997, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the must-carry rules. In so doing, the court laid down the rule that any must-carry provisions must be narrowly tailored to satisfy a compelling state interest. Mr. Kennard and his colleagues supporting the F.C.C. decision today have said that the rule would almost certainly be violated by a requirement that the cable operators transmit both the analog and digital signals. Because both signals convey the same programming, they have argued, it would be too great an imposition on the cable operators. The broadcast industry has lobbied the F.C.C. and lawmakers hard to expand the must-carry rules to apply to both analog and digital signals. Industry executives have blamed the slow transition to digital television in part on the reluctance of the cable industry to provide channels for both analog and digital signals. Today, the F.C.C. said that broadcasters basically had a choice. In a case filed by WHDT-DT, a digital television station based in Stuart, Fla., the agency ruled that broadcasters could either have their digital or their analog signal transmitted under the must-carry rule, but not both. Instead, the agency tried to leave it to the market to decide what would be viewed by cable watchers. Cable companies and the broadcasters would have to negotiate the terms of any arrangements under which a station could have both its analog and its digital signal transmitted.

To: LemonHead who wrote (8)	3/15/2001 12:13:32 PM
From: Ron	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152

Panasonic, a division of MC is a leading maker of the new HDTV cameras. Harris Corp HRS is a leading maker of the new HDTV transmitters. Sony SNE also making high end HDTV cameras. I have not been able to nail down the chip makers who will benefit most from HDTV, however. In this market, I am not going long in any tech stocks right now, except an occasional daytrade. But will keep these on a watch list, and add more when the info becomes available. If any one else discovers good additions to the due diligence list..please post here. Ron