SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: accountclosed who wrote (55156)1/7/2001 8:17:02 PM
From: Wyätt Gwyön  Respond to of 436258
 
From Irrational Exuberance by Robert Schiller, pp. 158-159 (emphasis added):

"If the removal rate is greater than the infection rate, then the epidemic will never get started and never even be observed.

"Epidemiologists use these models constructively to understand the pattern of disease outbreaks. Using these models they can infer, for example, that if the removal rate is just above the infection rate, then a nearly healthy population is in danger of an epidemic, for any small uptick in the infection rate or downtick in the removal rate can tip the balance toward a new epidemic. Thus epidemiologists can infer that a change in weather patterns that will tend to keep people indoors together (where they are move likely to infect each other) may cause the infection rate to increase above the removal rate. The epidemic will then begin, but the absolute number of infectives will grow slowly at first. If, in this example, the weather changes fairly soon again in such a way that the infection rate is brought back down, so that the number of infectives never becomes very large, then the epidemic will fail to be noticed by the general public. But if the bad weather lingers long enough relative to the difference between the bad-weather-infection rate and the removal rate, then the epidemic will become large and noticeable in the population at large. Epidemiologists can use this model to predict, according to this example, how long a spell of bad weather is necessary to produce a serious epidemic."



To: accountclosed who wrote (55156)1/8/2001 6:11:26 AM
From: Earlie  Respond to of 436258
 
Daer Uncle Al:

Thank God we have you!

No wonder the whole world loves and exalts you. And to think that I am fortunate enough to be your nephew.

I'll get right at that mortgage application this morning (hope they can process it quickly, as the SUV is empty).
By the way, as soon as I showed Elizabeth your reply, she stopped worrying about things. You do miracles in more than the financial world. (g)

Knock 'em dead Uncle Al and don't take no wooden nickles (g)

Love, Earlie