SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KymarFye who wrote (66239)1/8/2001 2:42:02 PM
From: Tunica Albuginea  Respond to of 99985
 
OT/OT/Kymar Fye, I think that current " malaise " in the market is politically related.
At a time of great changes in the markets, energy, inflation worries etc,
when we needed a firm guidance at the helm to direct the Nation,
we did not have one.

Instead we had/have

-Fed inability to intervene earlier with rates
-previous excessive liquidity

( both errors by Greenie for y2k )

-A prolonged painful election
-A lame duck President
-A Congress in transition
-A divided Nation

In my opinion we are near term oversold.

However this has wrung out significant optimism and
should serve for a nice base building.

If Bush's future guidance changes the ways games are played
in Washington. the 3rd leg down in the market could be averted:
We need

-spending cuts
-tax cuts
-entitlement cuts
-deregulation
-decrease litigation
-changes in energy policies
-change in immigration laws and allow seniors to
work and lower their taxes to pay for their benefits.
-eliminate Medicare-funded million dollar funerals for
seniors with terminal, ( death certain within 1 - 2.5 months ),illnesses.

I also believe that Bush with Congress' cooperation
and good will can achieve the above .

Not having your brain between your thighs
during work hours also helps.

This is a far stronger Nation than may appear at first glance,

TA



To: KymarFye who wrote (66239)1/8/2001 3:48:54 PM
From: Doug  Respond to of 99985
 
KymarFye: In brief your scenario replicates the 1929 and Japanese bear market. In numbers I understand it would look like this(using the NAZ)

a; A short down leg to +2251.

b: An up leg (15-20%)

c: A final down leg to below 2251. and presumably up thereafter.

How does the FED interst rate cuts align withe above.?

Thanks.