SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: craig crawford who wrote (114750)1/8/2001 3:27:49 PM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
If you bought stocks earlier at better prices you would be better off.

Yeah, if I'd been psychic enough to buy just before the rate cut I'd be down only two points instead of four. Big help that cut.

Actually the market rallied in '98 ahead of the first cut, then sold off to new lows until Greenspan cut a second time.

But in '98 the second fed ease was the "surprise" cut. As Meisler herself put it, the market had already "priced in" the first cut. This time, the "surprise" came first, and everyone "knows" another cut is coming, sooner or later. Yet the market shrugs it off.

Well we closed at 2291.86 January second and we are higher now so is that not an uptrend since Jan 2nd?

I'll take that as a "you're exactly right, 'uptrend' means 'anything not making new lows' to me" answer to my question.



To: craig crawford who wrote (114750)1/8/2001 4:07:43 PM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
See, now that we've actually held a level higher than the previous level and come off it, now you could claim some semblance (however tenuous) of an uptrend. It's not that hard a concept, really it isn't!