SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (56055)1/10/2001 9:49:39 AM
From: AllansAlias  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
Now you're talking. Recall the other day? Who was the Elliott nutbar who had a possible target under 200. -g I agree that the NASDAQ will LT break below 1000, maybe even as low as 700.



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (56055)1/10/2001 9:51:30 AM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 436258
 
Banks and Brokers rallying... LOL

DAK



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (56055)1/10/2001 9:54:23 AM
From: timers  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
how are you short the nas? shorting q's or puts?



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (56055)1/10/2001 9:58:15 AM
From: Percival 917  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
OUCH!!!!

If you extend out the chart and assume a continued performance by the Naz, we could be at 1000 by year end. I would think the downside risk would just about be out of the equation at that level. Who knows?

Thanks for the reply,
ED


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News