Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ed Forrest who wrote (46593)	1/10/2001 2:14:19 PM
From: Wyätt Gwyön	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77400

Just trying to make the point that people should believe little if anything they read on chat boards . Especially the crap written by mindless cheerleaders. Do you think there are any on this thread?

To: Ed Forrest who wrote (46593)	1/10/2001 2:15:37 PM
From: GVTucker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77400

Ed, RE: Agendas. Given that the rest of your post was in reference to me, as well as someone else, could you elaborate on that last word, please? Exactly what do you think my agenda was when I stated my opinion that the probability of Chambers saying something significant was minimal?

To: Ed Forrest who wrote (46593)	1/10/2001 2:16:00 PM
From: chic_hearne	Respond to of 77400

Looks like 2 of our resident pundits blew it big time today. You referring to me? Bambs?