SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (124649)1/11/2001 5:43:40 AM
From: Mary Cluney  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Tenchusatsu, <<<If we had to pay that much for gas, we'll see a lot more gas conservation, carpooling, people using mass transit, people living closer to their places of work, more incentive to build gas-efficient cars, etc.

Of course, that sort of solution would be extremely painful and unpopular.>>>

Scumbria is absolutely wrong wrt AMD prospects, but on this topic he is much closer to the truth. You don't have to be a microprocessor designer or a rocket scientist to see what the problem and solutions are. The truly important things in life are always simple to understand. We tend to screw things up by over complicating simple truths.

William Hunt who started this conversation is right on:
Message 15158442

<<<OT ---What a bunch of dummies in Congress . We have a recession at our doorsteps or already in the house , an energy crisis with oil , natural gas, etc , creating a giant sucking sound ( sounds like a tax hike ) , a Federal Reserve that went overboard on interest rate hikes and taken liquidity out of the market ( thus taken the life out of productivity ---the one true counter balance to inflation ) and a President who has been more worried about his legacy ( if their is one ) than taken care of the economy .
Instead Congress is more about tackling illegal aliens in someone house than addressing a national issue which is ---Energy . It is having a major impact on how we manage our economy and no one is paying attention . Maybe we ought to turn the lights in Washington D.C ---most of the idiots seem to work better in the dark .>>>

Mary



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (124649)1/11/2001 7:37:10 AM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Ten,

I guess with the right management, such telecommuting is possible, but I don't believe mass telecommuting is the solution to traffic congestion

It isn't a question of management, it is a question of attitude and belief. I know a guy who wastes 2 hours a day commuting from Pleasanton to Palo Alto. He gets to the office and spends the day sitting in front of his computer. What did he, or his employer, gain by wasting that time driving?

One or two days in the office a week is enough for meetings. How much would the quality of life improve in Silicon Valley if:

1. People could live further out and buy affordable housing?
2. Rush hour traffic was reduced by 50%?
3. Parents actually spent some time at home with their children?

Why do you think I left the valley?

Scumbria



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (124649)1/11/2001 8:40:58 AM
From: Dan3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Re: If we had to pay that much for gas, we'll see a lot more gas conservation...

That approach takes advantage of the workings of a free market economy. I think it's the only one that would be effective.

Regards,

Dan