Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rande Is who wrote (45291)	1/11/2001 3:24:15 PM
From: Rick Buskey	Respond to of 57584

DDDDDDDDDDUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

To: Rande Is who wrote (45291)	1/11/2001 3:26:07 PM
From: vampire	Respond to of 57584

till when though...and also, if they are saying that (and a certain euphoria seems to be back), doesn't that mean we are in fact going down?

To: Rande Is who wrote (45291)	1/11/2001 3:31:36 PM
From: sepku	Respond to of 57584

HOWEVER Dan Niles of Lehman Bros. says (now get this) "ignore Fed rate cuts, focus on falling demand and continued high valuations. We would continue to sell on the rallies." this is on the SEMI's which, i believe, is showing the best TA. another name to the Shite List aka #1 Blodgett. looks like the I.I. is finally starting to ignore these ANAL-ISTS 8-} GO LONGS cheers

To: Rande Is who wrote (45291)	1/11/2001 3:36:13 PM
From: duke-nukem	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57584

At this point, DUUUHHH! seems redundant. I listen to the analysts these days for comic relief. Unfortunately, the effect that they can have on the individual investor that actually listens to them is not funny.

To: Rande Is who wrote (45291)	1/11/2001 3:39:36 PM
From: Brasco One	Respond to of 57584

they are bunch of idiots.

To: Rande Is who wrote (45291)	1/11/2001 3:40:27 PM
From: American Spirit	Respond to of 57584

After nine months finally unloaded my UIS. Bought at 26 then all the way down at 9, now out with only a small loss. Once had a $12,000 loss on it. Whew! Might have sold too soon but it hit my sale price. Now hoping for a sell-off so I can get more goodies on dips. Holding all telecoms and wireless.

To: Rande Is who wrote (45291)	1/11/2001 3:58:31 PM
From: JLS	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 57584

So is QCOM...trading like it's got a warning in it's future. Careful, there's still some landmines out there. And now that CNBC has sounded "the call" look for the herd to barge in and you know what the Po boys do when that happens...

To: Rande Is who wrote (45291)	1/11/2001 4:06:03 PM
From: Bucky Katt	Respond to of 57584

Rande, yesterday I made a comment about the NDX trading range, today we came within a whisker of closing at the high end number. I would liked to have seen a close above 2525, but serious money was made today nonetheless.. ""I play the NDX, the trading range is 2074-2525, if either is surpassed, then the picture would be a little clearer."" NDX closed @2524.13 Not too bad.... As usual, the media/anal-ysts will call the turn<g> Bunch of f*cking morons they are.

To: Rande Is who wrote (45291)	1/12/2001 2:21:05 AM
From: Tradelite	Respond to of 57584

Rande, be careful (LOL!) with that Capital Area Internet Service stock (read the first letter in each of those words to get the stock symbol.....trying to stay below the radar screen in mentioning this stock). That company is my ISP, and so far I am still not getting billed for my excellent year 2001 internet service. Think they must have laid off the bookkeeper and cleaned out the accounts-receivable department???? Should be reflected in profit/loss statement later. Meanwhile, I'm enjoying the free ride. On another topic...., if the telecoms are truly going to keep on going up, might I suggest to the group that long-term investors consider FON.....nice dividend being paid there and a reasonable valuation for the company, so far. Hope FON doesn't cut that dividend like T did, though.