SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: S. maltophilia who wrote (88304)1/11/2001 4:33:52 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Neither SIPC nor anyone else will help when your MMF breaks the buck because of Tulip Funding or California utility commercial paper

For a MMF to break the buck would be considered a market loss, would it not? So I can understand why SIPC won't help you there.

The question is, if your brokerage suffers a Barings-type disaster, or even just a general market crash, will you be able to redeem your holdings from them? How do you even go about gauging the answer to this?



To: S. maltophilia who wrote (88304)1/11/2001 6:15:46 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Khalil, True, SIPC is not govt., but it has a lifeline call to the SEC. Since institutions have to register with the SEC to qualify for SIPC coverage, there is a quasi-govt. involvement. Any institution that does not ante up becomes an instant suspect. And nary a member does not opt for the insurance. If any firm goes belly up after extensive reporting to the SEC, the SEC will be crucified. And the Treasury along with it. So, the money will appear for the average investor.

We were talking about fraud or firm bankruptcy, not picking the wrong issues. Your stocks are insured against somebody stealing them, but not against your portfolio manager being an idjit head (even if it is yourself). Ditto for your money fund. I can't find anyone who offers idjit head insurance. And there are times when I could use it. <g>