SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nortel Networks (NT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: WiseGuy who wrote (9228)1/12/2001 9:31:48 AM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 14638
 
From the National Post
Battleship Cisco losing the war, says analyst
Downgraded to 'hold'

Scott Adams
Financial Post, with files from Bloomberg News

Don't buy the battleships, so don't buy Cisco Systems Inc.

That was the bold call yesterday by Steve Kamman, analyst
with CIBC World Markets, as he initiated coverage on Cisco and
other companies in the networking equipment industry.

Mr. Kamman's downgrade on Cisco shares from a "buy" to a
"hold" was enough to send the stock tumbling as much as 10%
and fuelled more uncertainty in the battered technology sector.

Once the pride of every naval fleet, battleships fell into
obsolescence in the Second World War, unable to defend
themselves against air bombers.

"When everyone starts buying up battleships, it's time to start
investing in aircraft carriers," Mr. Kamman wrote in a note to
clients.

Cisco isn't well positioned to sell the latest, best-of-breed
networking gear, he said.

Thus, it is time to buy stocks in some of the newer and smaller
companies -- the "aircraft carriers," Mr. Kamman said.

"We do not believe Cisco is well positioned to meet an expected Tsunami of changes in
the telecom market," he said.

"We believe Cisco will not make consensus revenue estimates in fiscal 2002 and expect it
will no longer be able to rely on appreciating stock as a currency" to make acquisitions.

Mr. Kamman's comments came on the same day that Cisco chief executive John Chambers
admitted that its second quarter has been "a little more challenging" than expected
because of a slowdown in customer spending.

"If there's a slowdown in capital spending, will Cisco be affected? Absolutely," Mr.
Chambers told a Morgan Stanley Dean Witter conference in Arizona.

It was the first time Mr. Chambers has spoken to investors since Dec. 4 when Cisco said it
expected revenue to rise 50% to 60% in fiscal 2001.

Cisco didn't change its guidance yesterday, but Mr. Chambers did say the company has
slowed its hiring pace. "Our visibility isn't as good as it normally is," he said, adding that
Cisco won't slow its pace of acquisitions.

Cisco (CSCO/NASDAQ) fell as low as US$33 41/64 yesterday, but ended down 7/8 at
US$36 1/4.

As for the aircraft carriers, Mr. Kamman isn't positive about all of them. He started
coverage of Redback Networks Inc. (RBAK/NASDAQ) by cutting it to "hold" from "buy." The
stock rose US$5 7/16 to US$40 7/8.

But he has "buy" ratings on others. He cut Juniper Networks Inc. (JNPR/NASDAQ) to "buy"
from "strong buy," but rates both Extreme Networks Inc. (EXTR/NASDAQ) and Foundry
Networks Inc. (FDRY/NASDAQ) a "buy". Juniper rose US$2 1/8 to US$119 5/16, Extreme
rose 7/8 to US$42 and Foundry rose 7/8 to US$12 1/4.

Perhaps his most surprising pick is Lucent Technologies Inc. (LU/NY), which he raised to
"buy" from "hold," while placing a target of US$20 on it.

"We believe the stock represents a reasonably safe harbour to ride out what look to be a
choppy few quarters," Mr. Kamman wrote. "Note that we do not minimize the significant
operating and strategic challenges ahead for the company." Lucent rose 13/16 to US$17
5/8.

Mr. Kamman was the CIBC analyst who followed the communications service providers --
the customers of Cisco and equipment companies. His insight into the customers has led
him to believe big changes are happening in the carrier networks.

Carriers have been trying to upgrade and change their voice networks so they can handle
data and the Internet. But Mr. Kamman believes those efforts will ultimately fail.

He believes that insurgent carrier companies will build simpler, more flexible and lower-cost
networks based on technologies such as optics. Equipment companies that sell gear to
these insurgents will do better.

"We expect winning companies will be those building equipment to cannibalize and disrupt
the existing public network architecture, not to sustain it," he said.

Part of Cisco's success, too, has been that it can sell a full network system.

It is much easier for a customer to go to Cisco and buy a complete system than to go to
various smaller players and buy parts of a system.

But Mr. Kamman believes this advantage is also disappearing, as customers are demanding
the most innovative, best-of-breed equipment, rather than a complete system.

How does CIBC think will this affect Nortel Networks Corp.? Mr. Kamman won't cover
Nortel, as it is followed by CIBC analyst Todd Coupland in Toronto, who could not be
reached for comment.

But Gus Papageorgiou, analyst at Scotia Capital, said that though Nortel and Cisco
compete against each other in various equipment product, Cisco's main business is in
routers, where it is competing against the likes of Juniper, while Nortel's main business is
in transmission equipment. Nortel is actually partnered with Juniper for routers, he said.

Nortel's leadership in optical transmission should also mean it can avoid becoming a
battleship, Mr. Papageorgiou said.

sadams@nationalpost.com

nationalpost.com