To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (11 ) 1/12/2001 4:27:56 PM From: keokalani'nui Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 142 Rick, I take it you did not go to ptn's presentation. I recall from the webcast (thinking I could listen to the reply I didn't take really good notes) the presenter's enthusiasm for an anti-inflammatory candidate. I forgot how he described the pathway, but it sounded (I'm as gullible as I'm undereducated!) promising. I believe this is it: Bioorg Med Chem Lett 1999 May 17;9(10):1469-74 Metallopeptide approach to the design of biologically active ligands: design of specific human neutrophil elastase inhibitors. Shi Y, Sharma S Palatin Technologies Inc., Edison Corporate Center, NJ 08837, USA. A series of compounds was designed to inhibit human neutrophil elastase utilizing a modified metallopeptide scheme developed in our laboratory termed metal-ion induced distinctive array of structures (MIDAS). These metallopeptides, synthesized by solution and solid-phase methods, exhibited excellent structural diversity and specificity in inhibiting human neutrophil elastase. PMID: 10360758, UI: 99287503 He also mentioned the satiety program and had some animal graphs. Your author was not capable of judging. He spent the most time on their metal binding substrate, peptide to pharmaceutical, smalmol drug develpment program (MIDAS)...singing the praises of its stability...though it sounded like it ends up a 'large' small molecule. One other stray thought. It may be in the filings, but I also recall him say that although Leutech is 'partnered,' ptn gets 50% of net sales . That's a filthy royalty if from someone also mftg and distributing--but I'm not sure about the details. Wish I could give you the kind of hard info you're looking for. --Wilder