To: Ron who wrote (8827 ) 1/14/2001 7:15:16 PM From: 49thMIMOMander Respond to of 34857 Eyes and phones. Well, some unknown things are probably totally impossible, some totally possible, but there is little one can do until more is known. Additionally "risk" is something difficult to handle when the known probabilty is very small, something proved by the popularity of gambling casinos and lotto (skipping the entertainment aspect). That's why I recommend hands free kits and a denser grid of basestations keeping the power levels lower. (as well as stricter standards on spurious out of band levels cleaning up the "ether") And, as Tero pointed out, large studies on brain tumors as well as eye cancer and degenerations are good in them selves, although other studies might be more productive?? (I need to upgrade to 21 inch monitors and the wife of a buddy actually has eye cancer,interstingly removing it is probably the worst thing to do?? the question on cooperating neighbouring cells) On a more basic level I think universal healthcare and pension systems limits most fears from being projected through things like Survivor (although that one focuses on social fears of not being accepted, sent home). And as long as the statistical correlation is too small to find, one just need to be and behave somewhat normal. Ilmarinen. P.S. Additionally universal healthcare is a good way of ensuring that the statistics are factual and covers everyone, not based on the need of funding for some academics or others who just lost their private funding, nor a matter of proprietary competitive information of private insurance companies, dealing with those who can afford an insurance. (usage of mobile handsets correlates with factors like that, the main causal factor is income)