Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mephisto who wrote (9318)	1/14/2001 6:17:41 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10042

Ashcroft doesn't need your support. The only question should be whether he is qualified. He's obviously qualified. Bush should have his pick. JLA

To: Mephisto who wrote (9318)	1/14/2001 7:04:09 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Respond to of 10042

Ashcroft is being picked for U.S. Attorney General, not U.S. Pope... the guy is more than qualified for the job, any other information about him is truly irrelevant to his selection... if he's also opposed to Affirmative Action, then I applaud him even more, Affirmative Action should be abolished immediately... Ashcroft is only being selected for a Cabinet post, nothing more than that... his record on law enforcement is impeccable... I also agree with his decision not to choose that judge for the federal bench, it was certainly well within the scope of Ashcroft's responsibilities to make a determination about that judge, and he decided he should not be granted that position... so what? Maybe Ashcroft should not be appointed U.S. Attorney General because he doesn't like the Miami Dolphins... after all, let's not get nutty already with irrelevant issues..... GZ