SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (122082)1/14/2001 11:10:15 PM
From: The Reaper  Respond to of 769667
 
Man, you are as uninformed as those clowns I saw on TV demonstrating. Legislation mandated that the utilities divest themselves of those plants. And I'm sure you know that a Democratic majority state legislature was writing legislation during the Wilson administration. Must be nice to go thru life calling people fools that point out your ignorance of certain matters.

kirby



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (122082)1/15/2001 10:56:33 AM
From: H-Man  Respond to of 769667
 
You post that there was a scheme by the utility companies, in selling the generating plants. What you fail to mention is that the sell off of power generating was mandated by the so called 'de-regulation', Which was nothing of the sort, btw. Furthermore, it is not the power generated from these plants that are costing so much. It is that which must be imported that has high cost.

True, some plants have been stalled by environmentalists

All of them Patricia.

From the Orange Co Register ...

Energy experts are quick to point out the underlying factors that created the unstable electricity market, mainly a scarcity of power in California, which has strict environmental rules that have kept ANY plants from being built in a decade.

they could laugh all the way to the bank.

They are loosing money. So that statement falls apart.

You also fail to mention that this scheme you say perpetrated by the power companies, has been demonstrated to be false, as investigated by the FERC.

De-regulation makes an easy target, but lacks any intellectual merit, since they did not deregulate at all. The retail end, and the domestic supply side, are still tightly controled by the state.

It is foolish of you, to post false misleading information, and not expect to be called on it.

---------------

some additional notable points

Heidi Anderson, Frost & Sullivan Energy Analyst (an independent energy consulting firm)


Perhaps the biggest problem in California today is the supply shortage. Simply put, supply has not matched demand. For the past three years, with the current backlog in generating plant construction, utilities have felt the power crunch in the summer months in California and lost tens of millions of dollars in the volatile wholesale market. San Diego Gas & Electric, the first utility in the state to recover its stranded costs, has passed on the price crunch to its customers and the public outcry has been sharp.

From LA Times ...

The essence of the problem is this: California deregulated the wholesale price of electricity, not the retail price, under the assumption that the wholesale price would remain low. It did not remain low, in large measure because a growing population caused the demand for electricity to increase at a time when California's ability to generate it REMAINED STATIC. In addition, the California Public Utilities Commission prevented investor-owned utilities such as Southern California Edison from entering into long-term contracts to buy electricity when the sale price of that electricity was still fixed by regulation.

Why did California's ability to generate power remain static ? Because the extreemists of the environmental movement successfully blocked new power plants. IF there was enough supply, the price would be under control.