SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (122085)1/14/2001 10:05:36 PM
From: TideGlider  Respond to of 769667
 
The rule of law in FLorida is being investigated right now!!! The rights of many were violated!!!

Maybe you missed this.

To: d.taggart who wrote (122049)
From: jlallen
Sunday, Jan 14, 2001 6:29 PM ET
Reply # of 122085

The truth about Race Huckster Rev. Jackson and voter "disenfranchisement".

When Jesse Jackson’s Lips Are Moving …
Neal Boortz
Friday, Jan. 12, 2001

Back in December America’s pre-eminent publicity whore, Jesse Jackson, was in Florida leading protest marches
and bleating into microphones. He was on every major network newscast, seemingly every night, saying that
George W. Bush and Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris had organized the Florida election in such a way
as to deny blacks and other minority voters access to the polls.
Jackson said that there was a "pattern of voter suppression" by state and law enforcement officials that prohibited
minorities from voting. The NAACP then chimed in, saying that minority voters had been prevented from casting
ballots.

There was something odd about Jackson’s ranting, though. Neither he nor the NAACP produced one single legally
registered black voter who was denied the opportunity to vote. I told you then that they weren’t producing
disenfranchised voters because they couldn’t find any. As is so often the case when Jesse Jackson speaks, it was
all blather. It was all lies.

Yesterday Jesse Jackson and the NAACP had a chance to put up. They didn’t. The U.S. Commission on Civil
Rights held a hearing in Tallahassee – at Jackson’s insistence – to investigate the charges. No Jesse Jackson. No
NAACP. Nothing.

So, who testified?

We had a man who said that he saw unmanned police cars near a polling precinct on Election Day. He thought that
was unusual. He went ahead and cast his vote.

We had a preacher who said he had been taken from the voting rolls when he was misidentified as a convicted
felon. One call to the election supervisor settled things and he cast his vote.

Then we had a woman who was stopped at a police license-check roadblock miles from her precinct. They asked
for her driver’s license. She produced it and was allowed to proceed. She says she was "intimidated," but she
voted.

Three witnesses, and not one of them had been denied their opportunity to vote. No other witness showed up to
say that he or she was actually denied the opportunity to vote.

Now, why wasn’t Jackson there? It’s not hard to figure out. It’s one thing to walk down a street chanting slogans,
to rant for the network news cameras about blacks being turned away from the polls. Its one thing to stand out
there and demand investigations, but it’s quite another thing to actually show up at the hearing you have called for,
raise your hand, swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, and then either commit perjury or
admit that you haven’t found one single black who was denied a legal right to cast a vote.

Jackson’s absence speaks volumes. Now we know. In spite of Jackson’s foaming at the mouth, there has not
been, nor is there now ANY meaningful evidence that there was ANY attempt on the part of ANY public officials
to keep ANY blacks from casting their votes.

Jackson, once again, has been exposed as a blowhard race-baiter. Do you think it will mean that he’s going to be
getting less face time on the news shows? Yeah, sure.

Let’s address this poor, poor pitiful woman who was so intimidated at that license-check roadblock. Just how was
she intimidated? She was asked for her driver’s license. That’s all. That’s it. They asked her for her driver’s license
and she wants to testify that it was an attempt by racist whites to keep her from voting.

Isn’t that just nifty? We’ve reached the point in this country where the very act of setting up a police roadblock to
check for licenses, insurance or boozed-up drivers is an act of racial intimidation. Instead of putting up signs on the
highway that read "police roadblock ahead," they ought to just say it like it is with a sign, "police intimidation
ahead."

Let’s see, in New Jersey we’ll soon be having cops waving black traffic violators off because of a de facto quota
system that is being initiated on traffic stops. Maybe in Florida we should have a policy of just waving blacks
through license and insurance check roadblocks. Don’t want to intimidate anyone, you know.

Oh, and did you catch Jesse Jackson recently on CNN’s "Late Edition"? Jackson uttered these rather strange
words about George W. Bush: "Bush stopped drinking at age 40. He drank longer than Dr. [Martin Luther] King
lived, at age 39. I'm not sure what all this means."

Huh? That makes two of us, Jesse. What on Earth are you talking about? What does the age at which Bush gave
up alcohol have to do with the age at which Martin Luther King Jr. was when he was assassinated? Of what
possible significance is this comparison?

Now, we know that Jackson had some goal in mind when he issued this comparison. Was it just a weak way to
mention George W. Bush and the assassination of MLK in one sentence? Is this a take-off of that NAACP
election television ad that sought to tie the name of George Bush to the dragging death of a black man behind a
redneck’s pickup truck?

And, if George W. Bush did drink longer than MLK lived, that would mean that Bush started boozing at the age of,
oh, about one.

Again, even though this man continues on a regular basis to make a complete ass out of himself, look for the leftist
media to continue their fawning over his every pronouncement.



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (122085)1/14/2001 10:29:43 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Respond to of 769667
 
Patrica, I'm amazed, Patrica truly complement's President Bush.
It's nice that you are coming around and now complementing President Bush.
Bush is a Smart Heroic American Man.
I never thought I'd see the day.

Tom Watson tosiwmee



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (122085)1/15/2001 5:10:33 AM
From: JDN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Dear Pat: I live in Fla so I get all the local news. As regards the civil rights commission and all so far it has turned out NO ONE had their rights violated in any way. The biggest problem which caused the most people not to vote was that in THIS election we had used the MOTOR VOTER registration and the Department of Licensing Burea DID NOT properly forward the info to the Burea of Elections causing much confusion and MANY delays. A lot of people just plan walked away due to the delays. THAT was what screwed up the Fla vote more than anything else. JDN



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (122085)1/15/2001 10:19:05 PM
From: D. Long  Respond to of 769667
 
To make it short and sweet - DUH.

washtimes.com

Derek