Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (984)	1/15/2001 9:58:53 AM
From: Poet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

It sounds like you and your wife are truly blessed. Congratulations!

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (984)	1/15/2001 10:29:52 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

My goodness! At last a substantive discussion! I'll jump in, too. I can't imagine anyone violating such a special relationship I can't either, and I think it's wonderful that you two have such a great relationship. In my mind, it's terrible to violate a relationship, but a relationship is not the same thing as a marriage. There are lots of relationships just as wonderful where the couple is not married. And there are lots of marriages where there is no real relationship but for some reason the couple stays married. I don't have a problem with adultery in a marriage where there is no relationship as long as the parties follow Poet's caveats. In my mind, it's the violation of trust and commitment that is important, not the institution of marriage. Karen P.S. I also agree with Poet on Clinton regarding Monica. What a jerk!