SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: James Clarke who wrote (11861)1/16/2001 12:34:09 PM
From: TimbaBear  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 78618
 
Would someone please either give me the definition of "net net" or point out where it is in any of the books we mention here(I think I have them all), or provide the link where it is given?

Thank you

Timba



To: James Clarke who wrote (11861)1/16/2001 1:38:26 PM
From: Q.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78618
 
James, I agree that homebuilders are cyclical, and that they up a lot from their lows. That's why I'm selling some.

My use of p/e ratios was not intended to determine whether I should be in the sector, but rather for comparisons within the sector of which homebuilders are most richly valued. Ditto with using the growth rates: I think it's worth knowing that contrary to what one might expect, the stocks in the sector that have the highest p/e ratios also have the poorest earnings growth prospects, according to analysts.

Contrary to your suggestion, I think this is a reasonable approach for what I'm doing: I'm not deciding whether to be in the sector, I'm choosing stocks within the sector to dump. In particular, I'm dumping the stocks with the highest p/e ratios and the poorest growth prospects, within the sector. Is that a bad idea?



To: James Clarke who wrote (11861)1/16/2001 1:42:22 PM
From: jeffbas  Respond to of 78618
 
James, I agree on homebuilders. CTX was one I looked at time and again when it was languishing at a P/E of 4 near $20. I could not understand why, but lazily concluded the market knew more than I did. A P/E of 10 is a far cry from 4.