Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mephisto who wrote (9368)	1/16/2001 3:25:31 PM
From: H-Man	Respond to of 10042

Politcal and policy disagreement is a good thing. Race baiting is not. I am sure you are familiar with the boy who cried wolf. Nothing you posted demonstrates racism sexism or any ism you want to throw. There could be 1000 reasons why one would not want any piece of legislation to be passed. Not the least of which is attaching riders to other bills. A common practice that legislator's do, when they want somthing that would not otherwise stand the light of day. I have no idea what the context was of any of the votes you cite. Neither do you. They are irrelevant anyway. Policy differences do not make one un-qualified.

To: Mephisto who wrote (9368)	1/16/2001 3:44:32 PM
From: Mephisto	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10042

....."according to the Violence Policy Center, Ashcroft penned a note to Pratt vowing to dilute an anti-crime measure that had been supported by no less a defender of gun rights than Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-Utah). It would have given federal law- enforcement authorities the ability to use the racketeering statutes to go after illegal gun traffickers. Not law-abiding dealers nor innocent hunters. Illegal traffickers. The provision eventually was weakened. Ashcroft sided with the gun lobby and against the FBI on the Brady Law, which requires criminal-background checks on gun purchasers. He voted, over law-enforcement opposition, to shorten the length of time officials are given to conduct the checks. He opposes current laws requiring the record of checks to be kept for six months. This is the FBI's way to ensure that the law works properly-that is, denying guns to criminals and others banned from owning them. Ashcroft is against all the usual half-measures the Congress sometimes tries to take to reduce the number of guns, or at least the deadly firepower, that is accessible to people like McDermott. He is against the 1994 ban on newly manufactured assault weapons, which expires in 2004 and will thus require the next attorney general's backing to be extended. He voted twice against banning the import of high-capacity magazines for assault weapons that remain in circulation. He voted against regulating gun sales on the Internet. He supported requiring the FBI to create a special database of felons who have won court approval to get their gun-rights back, to ensure that the felons' efforts to purchase new guns go smoothly. He supported a referendum in Missouri-a statewide ballot initiative the voters defeated-that would have allowed just about anyone, including stalkers, to carry a concealed weapon. Bush keeps talking about opposition to his controversial nominees as if it is an unseemly plot against the goodness he knows is in their "hearts." But the problem with Ashcroft is not in his heart. It is in his public record. Excerpts from an article by Marie Cocco. Marie Cocco's e-mail address is cocco@newsday.com. newsday.com

To: Mephisto who wrote (9368)	1/17/2001 8:59:26 AM
From: H-Man	Respond to of 10042

It seems the liberal rags you cite have left out a few salient facts. Turns out that the voluntary desegregation legislation you cite was really a dispute over who should pay for it. The city / county (the entity that collects the school taxes) or the State. Hardly voluntary forcing the rest of the state's tax payers to double pay school expenses. The league of womens voter situation you site, had the potential for fraud. IMO no non-governmental organizations should be registering voters. It has nothing to do with race. Your charges of racism dishonors those who fought real racisim.