Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KeepItSimple who wrote (125075)	1/16/2001 5:27:28 PM
From: Road Walker	Respond to of 186894

KeepItSimple, You are not keeping it simple. Intel practiced FD before than was an FD. I'm not cheerleading, I'm being realistic. If you think Intel is going to violate FD and announce it in an earning release, you are an idiot. John

To: KeepItSimple who wrote (125075)	1/16/2001 5:34:03 PM
From: The Duke of URL©	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

But that absence of reitteration will be the secret code word for "look out, we have bad news but we cant legally say anything, Keep, Did Intel say anything about winking? :) IF there is a MATERIAL change, it must be disclosed to everyone. What is of import is that Leavitt, who fought the Banks tooth and nail to get FD implemented has now resigned. We already know that Scrub has substantial experience with insider trading. (the sec allowed him to skate on a big one) If he appoints some limpdork who backs off reg FD enforcement because of his well connected buddies, WELL, THEN YOU MAY START TO REALLY WORRY.

To: KeepItSimple who wrote (125075)	1/16/2001 5:36:03 PM
From: vegetarian	Respond to of 186894

I am sorry, I got your point now. All you are saying is that: -Intel has publicly announced that they will violate SEC rules by selectively disclosing information -Everyone will read this and understand that by about tomorrow (may be with your help earlier, some idiots like I miss it on the first glance) -they will not of course like this kind of behavior -they will all start selling INTC stock to 0 because after all INTC has declared intention to do something illegal and we can't support a company doing illegal things can we? -your puts/short will be hugely in the money, finally -the smart KIS that you are, you will make a ton of money and finally not have to read between the lines to extract such brilliant interpretations that have made you rich Is that close? Looks like those careful reading habits and common sense is paying off after all. Good luck :-)

To: KeepItSimple who wrote (125075)	1/16/2001 6:13:56 PM
From: Mary Cluney	Respond to of 186894

Keep,<<<"look out, we have bad news but we cant legally say anything, so just consider my decision not to reitterate anything to be a warning">>> Intel economists know there is a 1929 type depression starting Q1 '01 and we will all be selling apples with a small "a". Nothing is going to save us. Interest rates and tax rates will be reduced to zero. Cap Ex is rising in preparation for life after Armageddan. Intel expects to come in below estimates without any expectations to see better days going forward. However, Ashok Kumar thinks Intel has a terrific future, but will wait until the stock price falls below zero and then may become an agressive buyer. Joe Osha does not think that investments in P4 production is wise. Joe knows better about what Intel should be investing in. On top of all this Intel expects to be prosecuted for planning to violate FD laws. More bad news is expected to follow. Is this good news, or what? Mary