Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tony Viola who wrote (125214)	1/17/2001 11:24:17 AM
From: Andrew Shih	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

TV, But on 0.13 micron, isn't the P4 still a lot bigger than a P3 on 0.18 micron? Add in 300 mm, and costs for P4 may start to approach P3. Basically, .13 micron and 300 mm are necessary for the P4 to be cost competitive. It's a good thing that Intel has lots of cash. In a year's time, I suspect that Intel will go from around 83% marketshare down to around 75%. I just don't see the Celeron and P3 being all that competitive on the desktop in a year, and AMD should have grabbed a small percentage of the mobile market by then. The key for Intel in 2001 will probably be the introduction of a SDRAM (or DDR) chipset for P4. Using SDRAM, the P4 is probably a LOT slower than w/ Rambus. DDR, however, should be a decent solution. -Andrew