SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (122340)1/17/2001 4:07:27 PM
From: Zoltan!  Respond to of 769667
 
Wrong.

Gray Davis and the Dems are responsible for the energy mess in CA.

January 17, 2001


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Back to the Future in California
By HOLMAN W. JENKINS JR.

California has done the near-impossible, turning electricity deregulation into a heart-thumping story. Has the mess sounded a funeral dirge for the prospects of a more competitive power industry?

Don't bet on it. Gov. Gray Davis's latest wild-eyed scheme would set the state up as the power supplier to California consumers, with the utilities acting as delivery men. Legislation rolled out yesterday would have the state paying no more than 5.5 cents per kilowatt hour, even if that means having to sign 10-year contracts with power companies. That price sounds good compared to the prices currently prevailing on the state's flaky "power exchange," but it's well above the long-run trend. Industrial customers around the country have been paying an average retail price of 4.3 cents, including various markups.

Sooner or later, the state can expect to be stuck holding the bag for Mr. Davis's high-priced contracts. Then the whole cycle that launched deregulation in the first place will start again.

Though the details were still being worked out last night, electricity sales in California are on their way to becoming fully politicized once more. Senate Chief John Burton says legislation to enact the plan will include "discounts" for homeowners and small business. Another report says high-cost power supplies will be reserved for industrial customers, while cheaper power coming from the state's paid-off nuclear plants will be devoted to consumers.

California legislators are getting ready to do again what they did for decades under the old system of cost-plus regulation, dumping on business in order to subsidize rates for voters.

It won't work. Prices will come down, and industrial users will insist on bypassing the expensive electricity Mr. Davis is trying to sock them with. Is he going to stop them and see the state's remaining employers get up en masse and move to Mexico? One way or another, California taxpayers or ratepayers will end up footing the bill, just as they did for the state's nuclear plants under the old system.

All of this seems a baroque way of avoiding the real problem, the impending bankruptcy of the state's two biggest utilities, Southern California Edison and Pacific Gas & Electric.

They've been caught in a squeeze between the fixed prices they're allowed to charge consumers and their inflated wholesale costs on the state's misconceived power exchange. By the time you read this, one or both may have filed for Chapter 11, dragged under by $12 billion in unpaid power bills.

At the moment it is virtually impossible to sort out the real shortage from the credit problems of the utilities. Prices in Western markets have been about 12 cents per kilowatt hour, while the price on California's power exchange has been above 30 cents, reflecting nothing but the fear that Edison and PG&E can't pay their bills.

BC Hydro, the big Canadian producer,could drop 1,000 megawatts on the state at a moment's notice. Indeed, it was making millions in the California market until it cut off the juice in mid-December. Why let water irreversibly over the dam if you're not sure of getting paid for it?

There was always an easier, more honest solution to this problem, such as admitting that the state screwed up deregulation and using government money to reorganize the utilities' debts. Had Gov. Davis acted when the trouble became glaring last summer, the cost would have been negligible and it probably could have been done without any rate increase at all.

But Mr. Davis has been guided by a single star throughout the crisis. Whether the lights stay on or not has been of secondary importance compared to avoiding any headline suggesting he "bailed out" the unpopular utilities. Mr. Davis is every bit as poll-driven as Bill Clinton. Unfortunately he lacks the latter's Houdini-like knack for synthesizing the poll data into a plausible policy.

This became clear last month when Warren Christopher, an Edison board member, found it necessary to give Mr. Davis a lecture on "the nature of leadership," as the Los Angeles Times delicately described it. At the same meeting Sen. Burton threw down a dollar bill at his feet, as if to say the buck stops with you. According to the Times, Gov. Davis tried to insist the bill had landed closer to a PG&E executive.

On Monday, the cat was publicly let out of the bag by federal energy official Curtis Hebert. "You've got a governor who cares more about being on a nighttime news show than he does about fixing the problem in California."

But if Mr. Davis has failed to rise to the occasion, the occasion deserves some of the blame too. No doubt this is a cosmic comeuppance for the political class's overselling of deregulation to residential users while vilifying the utility industry.

Let's face some facts: 70% of the costs of serving a typical household are the non-energy costs associated with delivering small amounts of power to thousands of homes. (Don't look at your electric bill for confirmation; many fixed costs are loaded into the kilowatt-hour charge as a subsidy to universal service.)

Deregulation was never aimed at these overhead costs. Under any theory of reform, distribution was destined to remain an uncompetitive monopoly at least until technology allows homeowners to churn their own power and declare independence from the grid.

Deregulation was aimed squarely at the cost of generation. That's still something: These costs account for 90% of a typical industrial user's power bill and a more efficient power sector would surely be a boon to U.S. competitiveness. But it was never going to be a big deal for residential customers. That's why the biggest enthusiasts for "retail choice" have been homeowners who actually lust after the option of high-cost "green" power.

What most homeowners want is reliability at a reasonable price. Deregulation can provide it, but it means allowing utilities the freedom of the marketplace to make their own wholesale arrangements and pass along the full cost to customers.

California could have recognized this six months ago and would have been in much better shape today. All that was lacking was a modicum of courage from the state's senior executive.
interactive.wsj.com



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (122340)1/17/2001 4:35:50 PM
From: H-Man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
I find it very interesting that the center piece of Gov. Davis's solution is exactly what the power companies wanted to do, and were denied doing, due to regulatory commission denial.

This of course being entering into long term contracts with suppliers.

Very interesting indeed.

And of course it is not the California domestically produced energy that is costing so much, it is the electricity that is transmitted from out of state.

The rest of your post is too incoherent to respond to. Sorry. But do enjoy the next eight years now.



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (122340)1/17/2001 5:20:26 PM
From: willcousa  Respond to of 769667
 
And some of you dems tried to say that W is dumb. Looks like, if you buy your crap, he is poised to make out big time.



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (122340)1/17/2001 7:53:55 PM
From: KLP  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
Patricia...I posted this on Friday, you may not have seen it....It WILL affect all of us...

FOOL ON THE HILL
Utility Dangers in California

Pacific Gas & Electric and Edison International, the largest electric utilities in California, have taken on $11 billion between them in debt to continue operating. They're working in a partially deregulated market, where wholesale prices can rise to the sky and retail ones are fixed. California's regulatory experiment has failed, and it may cause some real problems outside of California's borders as well. The culprit? Poorly conceived policy, badly implemented. Picture blackouts in Silicon Valley.
By Bill Mann (TMF Otter)
January 12, 2001

There are many of us on the East Coast who have been watching the California energy crisis with some sense of schadenfreude. After all, we're freezing out here, while in California, as always, the weather is mostly beautiful. I'm not sure what Californians are complaining about. Most people never even get to visit California.

There's just one problem: The power crisis in California could conceivably harm all of us. California, were it an independent country, would be the sixth-largest economy in the world. If you thought things were bad when Thailand cratered in 1997, just imagine what would happen if California's economy gets blasted. Unless there is relief for the utilities there -- and fast -- we could have a major economic crisis on our hands with at least two bankrupt utilities: Pacific Gas & Electric (NYSE: PCG) and Edison International (NYSE: EIX). The third major investor-owned electric utility in California, San Diego Gas & Electric, and its parent company, Sempra (NYSE: SRE), are not under the same pressure.

How is this bad for people outside of California? Consider this comment PG&E issued on Monday: "Unless strong steps are taken over the next few days, the financial crisis facing California's utilities will bring us to the point where we can no longer buy electricity and gas for our customers." PG&E is the former monopoly and current majority utility for Northern California, including San Francisco and the entire Silicon Valley. Imagine for a moment what happens when Cisco (Nasdaq: CSCO), Intel (Nasdaq: INTC), Exodus (Nasdaq: EXDS), and hundreds of other companies critical to U.S. commerce have to suffer through brownouts or blackouts because utilities are unable, or unwilling, to supply them power.

And imagine the disaster were the two utilities to go belly up, taking with them the $11 billion in debt they have racked up from such lenders as Bank of America (NYSE: BAC). I hate to color this as a doomsday situation, but if bold action is not taken, all of the little hints about "recession" will be replaced with a situation so severe it could have the effect of toppling over our delicately balanced economy like a bull hopped up on caffeine breaking loose at a chess tournament.

People are quick to point fingers in a crisis, and as the situation has gone from a disaster waiting to happen to a plain disaster, most are doing so. <b?But the silly people who single out deregulation as the major culprit have it wrong. Twenty-three states and Washington D.C. have taken on electricity deregulation, but only in California has it blown up. Why? Too many reasons to count.

Rather than point at deregulation, though, let's look at deregulation badly executed, courtesy of the legislators and regulators of California. It is an important lesson for any investor, because electric utilities are not the types of companies that have gotten people excited -- they are the companies that people put their retirement money into. In the case of those holding PG&E and Edison International, their "safe" utility stocks have been creamed, their dividends cut, their security dashed. It is a warning to all of us that we should not consider regulations to be natural law when choosing an investment. Laws can and will change, not always for the better. Those who invested in these utilities for safety of their principal are in danger of grievous losses.

California's electricity deregulation took effect in 1998. It meant, simply, that where there were once monopolies, consumers could effectively choose their power provider. But in order to allow the utilities to recoup their imbedded investments incurred prior to deregulation, the retail price for power was pegged at an artificially high level until the utilities recouped their investments. Seemed to make sense at the time, and the utilities signed off on it. So retail prices were fixed, but wholesale prices were not. The utilities were compelled to sell much of their generation capacity to other power producers, including Calpine (NYSE: CPN), Duke Energy (NYSE: DUK), and Enron (NYSE: ENE), who would then act as the spot market for the utilities (and other retail competitors) to buy their power.

But this set up a crush on the utilities when fuel stock prices began to skyrocket. There were several problems in California. The state had mandated that much of its power should come from non-greenhouse gas producing sources (with the exception of nuclear power). That's admirable, but also significantly more expensive. It had also outlawed coal-fired power, leaving most of the power in California to come from a single source: natural gas. These heavy restrictions, plus a case of NIMBYism writ large in the state -- no, I take that back, it's more like "BANANAism", or "Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anything" -- made it an unattractive place for power producers to come build. And so they did not, and for 10 years (until earlier this year) not a single megawatt of new power generation was built in California. Power generators had better fish to fry: They'd have rather drank axle grease than deal with the headaches of the California market.

The consumers didn't pay much attention because their prices were pegged -- until San Diego Gas & Electric completed recouping its stranded asset costs, and retail costs floated in its service area during the hottest summer on record, causing retail rates to triple. The utilities were already getting crushed by increased costs, as natural gas prices surged. Moreover, as demand screamed higher in California (electricity demand in 2000 was 10% higher than in 1999), supply of natural gas moved in sympathy. California couldn't count on its neighbor states to supply power: Nevada, Arizona, Oregon, and Washington all had surging demand of their own, and used to count on California to provide additional supply.

No new plants, no new external sources, surging demand, and fixed pipeline capacity for natural gas is a potent brew. To add insult to injury, perhaps the stupidest part of California's experiment was to prohibit the utilities from buying futures contracts, beholding them to the price of the moment. That, in a nutshell, is why wholesale power prices in California have risen from $30 per megawatt hour to $1,500. Since the utilities' retail price was pegged, they are in dire danger of complete collapse.

I've received several questions about whether the California utilities are a good buy here. Before I answer, consider this: The most recent relief plan is to allow the utilities to raise their retail prices 9%, and the governor has suggested that the state take over the production of electricity. Neither proposal alleviates the deeper problem: California will still be the screwiest, most-restrictive electricity market in the country. A state-run power authority will have no easier time getting siting plans past local political activists than the current incumbents have now. In other words, these utilities, from what has historically been the safest of equity sectors, are unlikely to gain any relief that will give them -- or other private companies -- much room to make a profit on their investments.

In other words, no. Under these conditions these appear to be horrible investments -- and will continue as such until California loosens up the regulatory burdens on power producers. Californians are going to have to choose: aesthetics or darkness, global warming or coal and nuclear power generation. There is no such thing as immaculate conception of electricity, much as we'd like there to be.

Fool on, and have a great weekend. If you're in California, turn off your computer before you go home.

Bill Mann, TMFOtter on the Fool Boards.



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (122340)1/17/2001 11:05:23 PM
From: Andy Thomas  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
--ABC radio reported some interesting facts about California's power problems this morning:--

just the other day i was open to just what bush might do... perhaps some of it would be 'positive.'

now i'm back to wondering, 'just what bush might do.'

one problem in all of this is that, gore wouldn't have really been any different; clinton is no different. so much of what goes on in the world is always the bilderbergers.

we're given false choices constantly, by the media and by the politicians, and probably by much of the clergy.

andy



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (122340)1/18/2001 6:06:22 AM
From: JDN  Respond to of 769667
 
Dear Pat: California's energy problems are solely of their own making and they have no one else to blame but themselves. California as WE ALL KNOW has a high proportion of ECONUTS and these people have been VERY SUCCESSFUL in COMPLETELY STOPPING any new Power Plant erections for YEARS. (incidentally in Calif. due to all the rules and regs it takes an average of 9 YEARS to build a simple power plant compared to 15 MONTHS in other states)
Anyhow, while limiting their CAPACITY to produce power and their ABILITY to charge for power they caused the 3 major Calif. power utilities to look elsewhere for power. that was all fine and good when rates were low, the UNIVERSAL oil shortage has driven up the price of fuel, hence power and Calif. utilities are NOW required to pay top dollar for their imported power but still STUCK with fixed rates.
Now, Pat, If you believe anything else you are very naive. this is the ANTI SPIN facts of the situation.
I personally see no reason why BUSH should bail them out or anyone else. This is a Calif. problem that should be solved by Californians. I suggest some HEADS ROLL and they WAKE UP TO REALITY OUT THERE. JDN