Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Q. who wrote (11901)	1/18/2001 12:22:05 AM
From: Q.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78628

Here's a similar net-net screen, this time with a ratio of 1.0 instead of 2/3. This allowed me to raise the floor on the market cap to a minimum of $50 M. Otherwise, it's the same screen. If the name of the stock included "CL A", I threw it out manually, for having multiple classes of stock: quote.yahoo.com

To: Q. who wrote (11901)	1/18/2001 12:30:09 AM
From: rjm2	Respond to of 78628

I am a RAGS fan. Also have a large position in SPORE but would gladly hang the management if given the chance. Also own a small amount of EBSC.

To: Q. who wrote (11901)	1/18/2001 9:27:02 AM
From: valueminded	Respond to of 78628

Looking at your list, I would immediately eliminate friedmans. If I remember correctly, it has multiple classes of stock with the caveat that the class you buy has no voting rights......So no way to force management to do anything... imo