SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (125529)1/18/2001 7:11:49 PM
From: Elmer  Respond to of 186894
 
Re: "Don't underestimate the potential of simple networks to accomplish every kind of multiprocessing task. How about SETI?"

Seti is a great example of distributed processing, like your home network, but that doesn't make it SMP. You will not see such an architecture running multiple threads of a single process sharing a single address space, as my dual processor celeron system does right now under NT4.0/WIN2000.

EP



To: Scumbria who wrote (125529)1/18/2001 7:14:17 PM
From: Gary Ng  Respond to of 186894
 
Scumbria, Re: I can have simulations running over the ether and Inter nets all night long

My tasks is simpler, I just run photoshop and found that it can make use of 2-way CPU system nicely but at this moment, does not support N-way system through the network yet, may be in version 10 :-(

gary



To: Scumbria who wrote (125529)1/18/2001 7:22:25 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Scumbria, <Don't underestimate the potential of simple networks to accomplish every kind of multiprocessing task.>

Good point. Compaq decided that 24 8-way SMP servers (each using 700 MHz P3 Xeons w/ 2M of cache) can be clustered together and beat out traditional big-iron servers in TPC-C:

tpc.org

So even 8-way SMP servers are considered "commodity" compared to what's out there already. Think you can do better by networking 192 single-processor Athlon boxes?

Tenchusatsu